Comparative research in the field of professional education of preschool teachers: comparative content analysis as a method of authentic interpretation of concepts

Nataliia I. Melnyk; Alla M. Bogush; Valentyna M. Vertuhina; Nataliia D. Trofaila; Nadiia V. Rohalska

doi:10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.1342

Authors

Nataliia I. Melnyk
nata-melnyk@uohk.com.cn
National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine
Alla M. Bogush South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K.D. Ushynsky, Odesa, Ukraine
Valentyna M. Vertuhina Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, Kyiv, Ukraine
Nataliia D. Trofaila Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University, Uman, Ukraine
Nadiia V. Rohalska Mykolaiv National University named after V.O. Sukhomlinsky, Mykolaiv, Ukraine

Keywords:

comparative content analysis, comparative researches, interpretation, method, speech-thinking activity, translation

Abstract

The article is devoted to the disclosure of psycholinguistic aspects of comparative research, in particular the specifics of speech and thinking activities of the comparativist in the application of comparative content analysis of Ukrainian and English scientific pedagogical terminology. Theoretical aspects of comparative content analysis in comparative pedagogical research are revealed, which consist in: objectivity of system and quantitative description of the available content of the term; counting the semantic units represented in the information array that are determined; objectivity of conclusions and rigour of a procedure; quantification of text processing with the subsequent interpretation of the results of the analytical review of the phenomenon under study. It is determined that the speech-thinking activity of a comparativist is characterised by a step-by-step and complex of complementary, interconnected operations, which consist of the following components: motivational-target, cognitive-semantic, reproductive-activity, creative-active, evaluative-reflexive. It was determined that the methodological aspects of the application of comparative content analysis are the necessity to separate units for analysis, the formation of a sample that will ensure the authenticity of the interpretation of the concept in the domestic research-pedagogical thesaurus.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adamson, B. (2012). International comparative studies in teaching and teacher education. Teaching and teacher education, 28(5), 641-648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.02.003

Antrop, M. (2001). The language of landscape ecologists and planners: A comparative content analysis of concepts used in landscape ecology. Landscape and Urban planning, 55(3), 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00151-7

Batyshev, SY (1999). Enciklopediya professionalnogo obrazovaniya: v 3 t. [Encyclopedia of vocational education: In 3 Vol.]. Moscow, Russia (rus) .

Bento, A. C. (2018). IoT of Nextion X TFT ILI9341: Experimental Results and Comparative Survey. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT and Scientific Research, 4(2), 14-23.

Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis. New York.

Bogush, A. (2015). The essence of communicative-speech support for the training of future educators. In: Problems and Prospects of Development of Education and Economy in the Twentieth Century. Rivne.

Bogush, A., & Kovtun, O. (2019). Discourse Radiotelephony of Civil Aviation: psycholinguistic aspect. Psycholinguistics, (25, Iss. 1), 11-32.

Bray, J. N., Lee, J., Smith, L. L., & Yorks, L. (2000). Collaborative inquiry in practice: Action, reflection, and making meaning. Sage.

Busel, V. T. (2005). Great explanatory dictionary of modern Ukrainian language. Kiev: Perun.

Cowen, R. (2000). Comparing futures or comparing pasts?. Comparative Education, 36(3), 333-342.

del Carmen Ramírez-Rueda, M., Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., Colmenero, M. J. R., & González-Calero, J. A. (2021). Towards a coordinated vision of ICT in education: A comparative analysis of Preschool and Primary Education teachers’ and parents’ perceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 100, 103300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103300

Diachuk, N. (2015). Realities of Speech Activity: Psycholinguistic Approach [Realiji movlennievoji dijalnosti: Psykholingvistychnyj pidkhid]. Naukov? zapiski Nac?onalnogo un?versitetu «Ostrozka akadem?ja»–Scientific Notes of the National University of Ostroh Academy, 58, 257-260.

Dressler, W. U., Lettner, L. E., & Korecky-Kröll, K. (2010, May). Acquisition of German diminutive formation and compounding in a comparative perspective: Evidence for typology and the role of frequency. In Current Issues in Morphological Theory.(Ir) Regularity, analogy and frequency. Selected papers from the 14th International Morphology Meeting, Budapest (pp. 237-264).

File, N., & Gullo, D. F. (2002). A comparison of early childhood and elementary education students’ beliefs about primary classroom teaching practices. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17(1), 126-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(02)00130-8

Goddard, C., & Wierzbicka, A. (2013). Words and meanings: Lexical semantics across domains, languages, and cultures. OUP Oxford.

Goncharenko, SU (1997). Ukrainskyy pedagogichnyy slovnyk (ukr) [Ukrainian Pedagogical Dictionary]. Kyiv, K: "Lybid .

González, J., & Wagenaar, R. (Eds.). (2003). Tuning educational structures in Europe. Bilbao, Spain: University of Deusto.

Graneheim, U. H., Lindgren, B. M., & Lundman, B. (2017). Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse education today, 56, 29-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002

Graue, M. E. (1992). Social interpretations of readiness for kindergarten. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 7(2), 225-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2006(92)90006-K

Ivashchenko, V. (2013). Framing and communicative terminology in foreign linguistics. Linguistics, 1, 51-58.

Kelchtermans, G. (1993). Getting the story, understanding the lives: From career stories to teachers' professional development. Teaching and teacher education, 9(5-6), 443-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(93)90029-G

Kharchenko, N. V. (2017). Listening in the paradigm of activity psycholinguistics. Humanities and Social Sciences, 37.

Kovtun, O. V. (2015). Formation of socio-cultural competence of future translators in the process of professional training. Science and Education, 2, 51-56.

Lasswell, H. D., Lerner, D., & Pool, I. D. S. (1952). Comparative study of symbols: An introduction.

Leontiev, AA (2001). Yazyik i rechevaya deyatelnost v obschey i pedagogicheskoy psihologii: Izbrannyie psihologicheskie trudyi [Language and speech activity in general and educational psychology: Selected psychological works]. Mos ^ w .: Moscow psychosocial inst ^, - Voronezh: NPO “MODEK .

Lindahl, M. G., & Folkesson, A. M. (2012). Can we let computers change practice? Educators’ interpretations of preschool tradition. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1728-1737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.012

Lokshina, OI (2015). Comparative education in Ukraine: trajectory of development. Ukrainian Pedagogical Journal , (4), 7-18.

Lonska, J., & Boronenko, V. (2015). Rethinking competitiveness and human development in global comparative researches. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 1030-1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00475-X

Melnyk, N. (2017). The phenomenon of “professional competence” in the Ukrainian and European pedagogical theory: a comparative aspect. Pedagogical Education: Theory and Practice. Psychology. Pedagogy, 28, 54-60.

Melnyk, N. (2019). Modern methodological approaches to the translation of foreign language scientific text in European philological practice. In: Proceedings From ??? International Scientific Conference 19: Modern Linguistic Paradigms, 5, 100-104.

Pakhomova, T. O., Komova, O. S., Belia, V. V., Yivzhenko, Y. V., & Demidko, E. V. (2021). Transformation of the pedagogical process in higher education during the quarantine. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 215-230. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5nS2.1341

Peterson, R. A. (2005). Problems in comparative research: The example of omnivorousness. poetics, 33(5-6), 257-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2005.10.002

Pukhovska, L. (2012). Integration processes in modern European pedagogical education. In: Postgraduate Education in the Context of European Integration: Essence, Content, Technology, Readiness for Change Kyiv: Pedahohichna Dumka.

Selivanova, O. O. (2008). Modern linguistics: directions and problems. Poltava: Dovkillia-? [in Ukrainian].

Shulga, M. A., Poperechna, G. A., Kondratiuk, L. R., Petryshyn, H. R., & Zubchyk, O. A. (2021). Modernising education: unlearned lessons from Frederick Taylor. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 80-95. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5nS2.1332

Surahman, B. (2020). The results of the plagiarism check of scientific papers: The Contraversi in pedagogical competence of early childhood education teachers towards the policy of Indonesia national education (1).

Tri, N. M., Hoang, P. D., & Dung, N. T. (2021). Impact of the industrial revolution 4.0 on higher education in Vietnam: challenges and opportunities. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5nS3.1350

Yam, B. M. (2004). From vocation to profession: the quest for professionalization of nursing. British Journal of Nursing, 13(16), 978-982.

Yencheva, G. (2012). Translation of aviation terminology abbreviations and acronyms in the normative and technical documentation. Problems of Semantics, Pragmatics and Cognitive Linguistics, 22, 44-52.

Zabolotna, O. (2015). Academic mobility projects management: challenges for Ukrainian professional education. Comparative professional pedagogy , (5 (4)), 46-51.

Zasekina, L. V. (2016). Individual intelligence in the context of modern psycholinguistic studies. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 53(4), 68-88.

Zelenko, A. (2010). The role and place of the comparative paradigm in the development of cognitive linguistics. Studia Linguistica, 4, 385-388.

Zyura, S. (2013). Features of the methodology of comparative pedagogical research. Practical Pedagogical Studios, 2(3), 7-13.