The role of linguistics studies on the political debate
Keywords:
campaign, debate, election, linguistics, politicalAbstract
The paper is to find out the linguistics role contribution towards the political debate event at the election party. The presidential debate's primary purpose is to sponsor and produce debates for the United States presidential and vice-presidential candidates and to undertake research and educational activities relating to the debates. A leaders' debate or presidential debate is a public debate held during a general election campaign, where the candidates expose their political opinions and public policy proposals, and criticism of them, to potential voters. They are normally broadcast live on radio, television and the internet. Increasing learners' confidence, poise, and self-esteem. Providing an engaging, active, learner-centered activity. Improving rigorous higher-order and critical thinking skills. Enhancing the ability to structure and organize thoughts.
Downloads
References
Fracchiolla, B. (2011). Politeness as a strategy of attack in a gendered political debate—The Royal–Sarkozy debate. Journal of pragmatics, 43(10), 2480-2488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.02.006
Starcevic, V. (2006). Somatoform disorders and DSM-V: Conceptual and political issues in the debate. Psychosomatics, 47(4), 277-281. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psy.47.4.277
Kallio, K. P., & Häkli, J. (2011). Tracing children’s politics. Political geography, 30(2), 99-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.01.006
Arroyo, J. B. (2000). Mire usted Sr. González… Personal deixis in Spanish political-electoral debate. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00040-5
Proctor, K., Lily, I., & Su, W. (2011). The 1st person plural in political discourse—American politicians in interviews and in a debate. Journal of pragmatics, 43(13), 3251-3266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.010
Tencalla, F. (2006). Science, politics, and the GM debate in Europe. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 44(1), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.04.011
Mohan, G. (2002). The disappointments of civil society: the politics of NGO intervention in northern Ghana. Political Geography, 21(1), 125-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(01)00072-5
Piketty, T. (1999). The information-aggregation approach to political institutions. European Economic Review, 43(4-6), 791-800. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00094-4
Hunt, C. V., Kim, A., Borgida, E., & Chaiken, S. (2010). Revisiting the self-interest versus values debate: The role of temporal perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1155-1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.004
Bulkeley, H. (2005). Reconfiguring environmental governance: Towards a politics of scales and networks. Political geography, 24(8), 875-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.07.002
Minteer, B. A., & Miller, T. R. (2011). The New Conservation Debate: ethical foundations, strategic trade-offs, and policy opportunities. Biological Conservation, 144(3), 945-947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.07.027
Gomez, M. C. (2009). Towards a new approach to the linguistic definition of euphemism. Language Sciences, 31(6), 725-739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2009.05.001
Ogiela, M. R., & Ogiela, U. (2012). DNA-like linguistic secret sharing for strategic information systems. International Journal of Information Management, 32(2), 175-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.11.016
Pesina, S., & Solonchak, T. (2015). Concept in Cognitive Linguistics and Biocognitive Science. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 587-592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.100
Newmeyer, F. J. (2014). Linguistic theory in America. Elsevier.
Kacprzyk, J., & Zadrożny, S. (2005). Linguistic database summaries and their protoforms: towards natural language based knowledge discovery tools. Information Sciences, 173(4), 281-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2005.03.002
Fedrizzi, M., & Kacprzyk, J. (1988). An interactive multi-user decision support system for consensus reaching processes using fuzzy logic with linguistic quantifiers. Decision Support Systems, 4(3), 313-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9236(88)90019-X
Kacprzyk, J., Wilbik, A., & Zadrożny, S. (2008). Linguistic summarization of time series using a fuzzy quantifier driven aggregation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 159(12), 1485-1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2008.01.025
Ogiela, M. R., & Ogiela, U. (2012). Linguistic protocols for secure information management and sharing. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 63(2), 564-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2011.10.038
Kacprzyk, J., & Fedrizzi, M. (1989). A ‘human-consistent’degree of consensus based on fuzzy login with linguistic quantifiers. Mathematical Social Sciences, 18(3), 275-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(89)90035-8
Ephratt, M. (2011). Linguistic, paralinguistic and extralinguistic speech and silence. Journal of pragmatics, 43(9), 2286-2307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.006
Kravchenko, A. (2006). Cognitive linguistics, biology of cognition and biosemiotics: Bridging the gaps. Language sciences, 28(1), 51-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2005.02.002
Kacprzyk, J., & Zadrożny, S. (2016). Linguistic summarization of the contents of Web server logs via the Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) operators. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 285, 182-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2015.07.020
Kacprzyk, J., & Yager, R. R. (1984). “Softer” optimization and control models via fuzzy linguistic quantifiers. Information Sciences, 34(2), 157-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(84)90022-7
Boeckx, C., & Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (2005). Language as a natural object–linguistics as a natural science. The linguistic review, 22(2-4), 447-466. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.447
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2019 Linguistics and Culture Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
