Analytical and philosophical issues of studying current problems in the development of modern derivatology

Yuri Shepel; Nataliia Pidmohylna; Dimona Amichba; Olena Shkurko; Iryna Muliar

doi:10.21744/lingcure.v5nS4.1562

Authors

Yuri Shepel
shepel7736@nuos.pro
Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Dnipro, Ukraine
Nataliia Pidmohylna Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Dnipro, Ukraine
Dimona Amichba Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Dnipro, Ukraine
Olena Shkurko Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Dnipro, Ukraine
Iryna Muliar Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Dnipro, Ukraine

Keywords:

cognitive linguistics, complex units, word-formation categories, word-formation rows, word-formation system, word-formation type

Abstract

The relevance of the research undertaken is determined by the insufficient description of the cognitive approach in relation to word formation units, the unjustifiably rare use of word formation data by the conceptology that is actively developing in linguistics, and the need to form semantic-cognitive analysis procedures relevant to the research object to determine the boundaries of complex units of the word-formation level. The article focuses on the philosophical issues of linguistics, in particular word formation. The peculiarity of linguistics at the end of the 20th century, the essence of which is the recognition of the cognitive conditioning of the main linguistic units and structures, is noted. It is noted that the materialization of certain concepts with the help of linguistic means always consists of a certain ordering, systematization, distribution by headings, categorization. The main function of the analysis and classification of derived words is determined not as groups of derived words or a system of derivational types, but the principles of construction and deployment of complex derivational fragments (blocks, rows, fields), taking into account derivational units larger than a word, analytical analogs of derived words, constructions in the derivation function, only way to represent the derivative and its semantics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Araeva, L.A. (1994). Word-formation type as a semantic microsystem. Suffix Substances. Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat.

Araeva, L.A. (2000). Word-formation type: to the problem of definition. In Problems of Russian Studies. Tomsk: Publishing House of Tomsk State University. 57-58.

Bar-Tal, D. (1996). Development of social categories and stereotypes in early childhood: The case of “the Arab” concept formation, stereotype and attitudes by Jewish children in Israel. International journal of intercultural relations, 20(3-4), 341-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(96)00023-5

Ehret, G., & Merzenich, M. M. (1988). Complex sound analysis (frequency resolution, filtering and spectral integration) by single units of the inferior colliculus of the cat. Brain Research Reviews, 13(2), 139-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0173(88)90018-5

Evseeva, I.V. (2011). Cognitive modeling of the word-formation system of the Russian language (based on complex units): thesis for the degree of Full Doctor in Philology. Kemerovo: Kemerovo State University.

Golev, N. D. (1996). O prirode motivatsionnykh assotsiatsiy v leksike russkogo yazyka [On the nature of motivational associations in the vocabulary of the Russian language]. Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya filologii, zhurnalistiki, istorii, sotsiologii, pedagogiki, yurisprudentsii, ekonomiki, 2, 7-11.

Kade, T. Kh. (1993). Derivational potential of suffix types of Russian nouns. Maykop: Adygean Republican Book Publishing.

Katagoshchina, N.A. (2012). How words are formed in French. Moscow: KomKniga.

Katagoshchina, N.A., Gurycheva, M.S. & Allendorf, K.A. (1976). History of the French language. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola.

Keohin, H. C. ., & Graw, N. J. . (2017). Linguistic and cognitive ability of children before five years old on their effort to communicate action. Linguistics and Culture Review, 1(1), 50-59.

Kertész, A., Schwarz-Friesel, M., & Consten, M. (2012). Introduction: Converging data sources in cognitive linguistics. Language Sciences, 34(6), 651-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.04.006

Kovalik, I.I. (1978). The root of the word and its role in the word-formation nest. In Actual problems of Russian word formation. Tashkent: Nizami Tashkent State Pedagogical University, 39-42.

Kravchenko, A. (2006). Cognitive linguistics, biology of cognition and biosemiotics: Bridging the gaps. Language sciences, 28(1), 51-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2005.02.002

Kubryakova, E.S (1980). Dynamic representation of a synchronous language system. In Hypothesis in modern linguistics. Moscow: Nauka, 217-259.

Kubryakova, E.S. (2004). Language and knowledge. Towards a knowledge of language: Parts of speech from a cognitive perspective. The role of language in the knowledge of the world. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury.

Kubryakova, E.S., Iriskhanova, O.K. (2007). Linguistic abstraction in category names. Notices of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Literature and language series, 66(2), 3-12.

Kyrtepe, A.M. (2010). Macro-units of word formation as a form of linguistic objectification of the concept: on the material of word-formation nests and word-formation category with the meaning of femininity in Russian: thesis for the degree of PhD in Philology. Saratov: N.G. Chernyshevsky Saratov State University.

Lakoff, J. (1998). Thinking in the Mirror of Classifiers. New in foreign linguistics. Moscow: Progress.

Langacker, R.W. (1991). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Langacker, R.W. (2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

Minskiy, M. (1979). Frames for the presentation of knowledge. Moscow: Mir, Energiya.

Moiseev, A.I. (1987). The main issues of word formation in modern Russian literary language. Leningrad: LSU.

Needham, A., Dueker, G., & Lockhead, G. (2005). Infants' formation and use of categories to segregate objects. Cognition, 94(3), 215-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.02.002

Netra, I. M. (2016). Lexical representations of prototypes of semantic primitives in balinese tradition and their meaning configuration in english. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 2(2), 38-49.

Nikolaev, G.A. (2010). Russian historical word formation: theoretical problems. Moscow: LIBROKOM.

Nikolaev, G.A. (2011). Russian and Slavic word formation: Opera Selecta. Kazan: Publishing House of Kazan University.

Otakhonova, K. (2021). Cognitive principle of foregrounding in the mass-media. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 7(4), 194-200.

Pelepeychenko, L., Zatsnyi, Y., & Zaitseva, M. (2021). Cognitive dissonance as factor of influence in American courtroom discourse. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 173-186.

Pignotti, A., & Shah, R. K. (1992). Effectiveness-number of transfer units relationships for heat exchanger complex flow arrangements. International journal of heat and mass transfer, 35(5), 1275-1291. https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(92)90184-T

Riemer, N. (2019). Cognitive linguistics and the public mind: Idealist doctrines, materialist histories. Language & Communication, 64, 38-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.09.002

Roche, J. (2005). Fremdsprachenerwerb. Fremdsprachendidaktik. Tübingen: A. Francke Verlag.

Stepanov, Yu.S. (1994). Word: From an article for a dictionary of concepts: Concept of Russian culture. Philologica, 1(2), 11-31.

Suryasa, I.W., Sudipa, I.N., Puspani, I.A.M., Netra, I.M. (2019). Translation procedure of happy emotion of english into indonesian in k???a text. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(4), 738–746

Tendahl, M., & Gibbs Jr, R. W. (2008). Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive linguistics and relevance theory. Journal of pragmatics, 40(11), 1823-1864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.02.001

Tikhonov, A.N. (1971). Problems of compiling a nested word-formation dictionary of the modern Russian language. Samarkand: A. Navoi Samarkand State University.

Tikhonov, A.N. (1974). Formal-semantic relations of words in the word-formation nest: thesis for the degree of Full Doctor in Philology. Moscow: Institute of the Russian Language of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Tikhonov, A.N. (1982). Problems of studying complex units of the word-formation system. In Topical issues of Russian word formation: materials of the scientific conference, (pp. 3-13). Tashkent: Fan.

Tikhonov, A.N. (2001). The state of scientific development of the nest and the prospects for its research. In Actual problems of Russian word formation: Materials of the VII International Scientific Conference, (pp. 10-21). Yelets: I.A. Bunin Yelets State University.

Tikhonov, A.N., & Pardaev A.S. (1989). The role of sockets of one-root words in the system organization of Russian vocabulary: Reflected synonymy. Reflected homonymy. Reflected antonymy. Tashkent: Fan.

Truong, H. M. (2016). Integrating learning styles and adaptive e-learning system: Current developments, problems and opportunities. Computers in human behavior, 55, 1185-1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.014

Ulukhanov, I.S. (1996). Units of the word-formation system of the Russian language and their lexical implementation. Moscow: Institute of the Russian Language of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Flanagan, J. R. (2001). Perspectives and problems in motor learning. Trends in cognitive sciences, 5(11), 487-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01773-3