Pragmalinguistic aspects of compound nouns in English and Uzbek
Keywords:
communicative grammar, compound word, linguistics, pragmalinguistic, pragmatic aspectsAbstract
This article describes compound nouns in English and Uzbek, their specific pragmatic aspects. Although the problem of compound nouns in linguistics has been studied by many linguists, there are many unsolved problems in comparing compound words in languages ??and analyzing them from a pragmalinguistic point of view. The compound word, which has a special place in the richness of language vocabulary, is in fact a convenient way of naming in simple terms the concepts of events that take place in reality, of existing objects. Hence, it can be concluded that the study of semantic, grammatical and syntactic features of language alone is not enough. As a result, the field of "pragmatics" has found its place in linguistics, having its own goals and objectives. In addition, the article also uses analysis from examples from the literature to reveal the pragmatic nature of compound words. However, scientific examples have shown that no sign is a leading factor in determining the nature of compound words.
Downloads
References
Andaniyazova, D. R. (2021). Literary-aesthetic function of Turkic onomastic units in literary text. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 7(5), 356-361. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v7n5.1929
Aripov, M. P. (2021). Semantics of wishes/applause/prayers associated with religious terms. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 7(4), 274-278. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v7n4.1808
Chang, Y. F. (2011). Interlanguage pragmatic development: The relation between pragmalinguistic competence and sociopragmatic competence. Language Sciences, 33(5), 786-798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.02.002
De Groot, A. M., & Nas, G. L. (1991). Lexical representation of cognates and noncognates in compound bilinguals. Journal of memory and language, 30(1), 90-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(91)90012-9
Holland, A. L. (1991). Pragmatic aspects of intervention in aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 6(2), 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0911-6044(91)90007-6
Imai, M., & Gentner, D. (1997). A cross-linguistic study of early word meaning: Universal ontology and linguistic influence. Cognition, 62(2), 169-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00784-6
Incecay, V., & Dollar, Y. K. (2011). Foreign language learners’ beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3394-3398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.307
Kifer F. (1985). The role of pragmatics in linguistic description. New in zarubejnoy linguistics. Vyp. XVI.
Kim, D., & Hall, J. K. (2002). The role of an interactive book reading program in the development of second language pragmatic competence. The modern language journal, 86(3), 332-348.
Levelt, W. J. (1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 42(1-3), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90038-J
Levinson S.C. (2008). Pragmatics. - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: an introduction.
Morris Ch.U. (1983). Basic theories of signs. Semiotics.
Newton, J., & Kennedy, G. (1996). Effects of communication tasks on the grammatical relations marked by second language learners. System, 24(3), 309-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(96)00024-3
Peniro, R. ., & Cyntas, J. . (2019). Applied linguistics theory and application. Linguistics and Culture Review, 3(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v3n1.7
Safarov Sh. (2008). Pragmalinguistics. Monograph. - T .: National Encyclopedia of Uzbekistan.
Savi?, M., Economidou-Kogetsidis, M., & Myrset, A. (2021). Young Greek Cypriot and Norwegian EFL learners: Pragmalinguistic development in request production. Journal of Pragmatics, 180, 15-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.006
Spahiu, I., & Kryeziu, N. (2021). Grammatical mistakes of Albanian students in learning English as a foreign language. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 814-822. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS3.1366
Stolneyker R.S. (1986). Pragmatics. Novoe v zarubejnoy lingvistike. Vyp. XVI, M.
Suryasa, I.W., Sudipa, I.N., Puspani, I.A.M., Netra, I.M. (2019). Translation procedure of happy emotion of english into indonesian in k???a text. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(4), 738–746
Takahashi, S. (2015). The effects of learner profiles on pragmalinguistic awareness and learning. System, 48, 48-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.09.004
Xu, Z. (2004). A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations. Information sciences, 166(1-4), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2003.10.006
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2021 Linguistics and Culture Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
