A  case study on effective teaching strategies for attaining course learning outcomes

Awwad Othman Abdelaziz Ahmed; Intisar Zakariya Ahmed Ibrahim

doi:10.21744/lingcure.v5nS4.2272

Authors

Awwad Othman Abdelaziz Ahmed
a.awwad@tu.edu.sa
Department of Foreign Languages, College of Arts, Taif University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Intisar Zakariya Ahmed Ibrahim Department of English and Translation, College of Science and Arts, Qassim University, Ar Rass, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Keywords:

adaptability, language teaching, efficiency, engagement, lesson planning, linguistic proficiency, teacher-centered

Abstract

Lesson planning has been a subject of debate within the realm of education, with contrasting views regarding its merits. This study employs a descriptive cross-sectional survey design to investigate lecture planning practices among teaching staff in the English Language and Translation Department at Qassim University, Saudi Arabia. The research focuses on understanding current practices and potential gender-related differences in teaching strategies. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire distributed to 26 university teaching staff, evenly split between males and females. The results indicate that faculty members exhibit a positive attitude towards lesson planning, emphasizing careful preparation, alignment with course objectives, and responsiveness to student needs. While some variations between male and female teachers were observed, particularly in lesson planning and the use of teaching aids, no significant gender-based disparities were found in many teaching practices. This suggests that effective teaching strategies can be employed by educators of any gender, challenging gender-based assumptions about teaching styles. Implications of the study underscore the importance of recognizing and celebrating diverse teaching approaches among faculty members. Rather than making gender-based assumptions, educational institutions should foster an inclusive environment where educators are encouraged to leverage their unique strengths.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives: complete edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Baker, S., Hudson, P. W., Matear, D., Sujan, H., & Yorkston, E. (2018). The role of gender and teaching experience in the self-efficacy of university faculty in teaching and technology. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 26.

Bean, J. C., & Melzer, D. (2021). Engaging ideas: The professor's guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. John Wiley & Sons.

Benedict, N., Schonder, K., & McGee, J. (2013). Promotion of self-directed learning using virtual patient cases. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(7), 151. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe777151

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Train-the-trainers: Implementing outcomes-based teaching and learning in Malaysian higher education. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 8, 1-19.

Bin-Hady, W. R .A & Abdulsafi, A. S. T. (2018). How can i prepare an ideal lesson-plan?. International Journal of English and Education, 7(2), 275-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3434031

Bin-Hady, W. R. A. (2018). A study of novice teachers' challenges at their practical teaching phase. IJLRES-International Journal on Language, Research and Education Studies, 2(3), 333 – 345. https://doi.org/10.30575/2017/IJLRES-2018091203

Blair, E. E., Miller, R. B., Ong, M., & Zastavker, Y. V. (2017). Undergraduate STEM instructors' teacher identities and discourses on student gender expression and equity. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(1), 14-43.

Brantes Ferreira, J., Zanela Klein, A., Freitas, A., & Schlemmer, E. (2013). Mobile learning: definition, uses and challenges. In Increasing student engagement and retention using mobile applications: Smartphones, Skype and texting technologies (pp. 47-82). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Crosby, R. H. J. (2000). AMEE Guide No 20: The good teacher is more than a lecturer-the twelve roles of the teacher. Medical teacher, 22(4), 334-347.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Baratz-Snowden, J. (2007). A good teacher in every classroom: Preparing the highly qualified teachers our children deserve. Educational Horizons, 85(2), 111-132.

Entwistle, N. J. (2013). Styles of learning and teaching: An integrated outline of educational psychology for students, teachers and lecturers. Routledge.

Hanish, L. D., Martin, C. L., Cook, R., DeLay, D., Lecheile, B., Fabes, R. A., ... & Bryce, C. (2021). Building integrated peer relationships in preschool classrooms: The potential of buddies. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 73, 101257.

Heikkilä, M. (2020). Gender equality work in preschools and early childhood education settings in the Nordic countries—an empirically based illustration. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 1-8.

Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 1-25.

Khanova, J., Roth, M. T., Rodgers, J. E., & McLaughlin, J. E. (2015). Student experiences across multiple flipped courses in a single curriculum. Medical education, 49(10), 1038-1048.

Lee, E., & Hannafin, M. J. (2016). A design framework for enhancing engagement in student-centered learning: Own it, learn it, and share it. Educational technology research and development, 64, 707-734.

Lunn, B., Lavin, M., & Parsons, J. (2020). Gender, research and university teaching: The experiences of female academics. Studies in Higher Education, 45(3), 493-505.

Magulod Jr, G. C. (2018). Innovative learning tasks in enhancing the literary appreciation skills of students. Sage Open, 8(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440188203.

Magulod Jr, G. C. (2019). Learning styles, study habits and academic performance of Filipino University students in applied science courses: Implications for instruction. JOTSE: Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(2), 184-198.

Magulod, G. C. (2017). Personal epistemologies and teaching styles of Filipino Preservice elementary teachers: Implications to teacher education preparation program. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(1), 31-40.

Martin, P. Y. (2012). 'Said and done' versus 'saying and doing': Gendering practices, practicing gender at work. Gender and Society, 16(2), 175-199.

Martinez, M. A., Sauleda, N., & Huber, G. L. (2016). Teachers' gender stereotypes as determinants of teacher perceptions in elementary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1-2), 1-23.

Nilson, L. B. (2016). Teaching at its best: A research-based resource for college instructors. John Wiley & Sons.

Niven, P. R., & Lamorte, B. (2016). Objectives and key results: Driving focus, alignment, and engagement with OKRs. John Wiley & Sons.

Perry, R. R., & Lewis, C. C. (2009). What is successful adaptation of lesson study in the US?. Journal of educational change, 10, 365-391.

Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital science and education, 2, 923-945.

Rodriguez, C. G., & Mendoza, R. L. (2019). Gender differences in teaching styles and strategies of instructors in a teacher education institution. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(11), 188-203.

Shabiralyani, G., Hasan, K. S., Hamad, N., & Iqbal, N. (2015). Impact of visual aids in enhancing the learning process case research: District Dera Ghazi Khan. Journal of education and practice, 6(19), 226-233.

Turban, E., King, D., Lee, J., & Viehland, D. (2004). Electronic Commerce: a managerial perspective. London, UK: Pearson Education.

Wieman, C., Perkins, K., & Gilbert, S. (2010). Transforming science education at large research universities: A case study in progressxs. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 42(2), 6-14.